Re: Setting environment variables
Mark Evenson <[email protected]> Thu, 4 May 2023 11:46:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On May 3, 2023, at 17:30, Mark Evenson <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On May 2, 2023, at 21:16, Alan Ruttenberg <[email protected]> = wrote: >>=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >>=20 >> It's true that I use aio. TBH I've never understood the point of = separating the contribs from the base. File size isn't an issue any = more. What's the upside of splitting them apart? A bit of extra time = indexing the classes in the jar? >=20 Updated the rationale on=20 > =46rom = <https://github.com/armedbear/abcl/blob/master/doc/packaging-abcl.org>: to read: The standard ABCL build process as described in the build.xml file and executed by the Ant build tool results in two artifacts: abcl.jar and abcl-contrib.jar. abcl.jar contains all the Java and Common Lisp code necessary that constitute the ANSI conforming implementation runtime, plus the latest stable ASDF. The abcl-contrib.jar (aka contrib) artifact contains additional Common Lisp-only code that extends the implementation in useful manners. We create two separate jar artifacts in order to: 1. To place an upper bound of size and complexity of abcl.jar regardless of what we package in abcl-contrib.jar. Having a restricted core ANSI implementation plus ASDF enables us to: 1.1. More easily bootstrap ABCL when porting to JVM runtimes other than the OpenJDK (Dalvik, CLR, ) 1.2. Subsequently use ASDF to package ABCL extension components. 2. Clearly mark which parts of the code-base are covered under GPLv2+classpath from those that may have other licensing terms. By making the loading of contrib a dynamic operation, we defer possible infringement to the User who redistributes the resulting jar artifact. --=20 "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is = nothing=20 to compare to it now."