Re: Java 21 for jEdit ?

Hi,

yes, I just
tried with my usual jEdit package
and run into the error with Adoptium
Java 17.0.8.1 and jdk-20.0.2+9. BUT, if I use a pur jedit 5.6
install without plugins and settings, the test macro runs fine
with these jdk's. Obviously I hadn't double checked last year
:-(

Now it seems,
that a combination of actual jdk and some plugin or setting is
causing the exception. I'll take a deeper look.

Robert

Am 04.10.2023 um
22:10 schrieb Matthieu Casanova:

Hey,

are you able to reproduce it today ?

I tried with a macro

sb.bsh containing

StringBuilder sb = new
StringBuilder();

sb.append("test");

System.out.println(sb.toString());

I run it with Java 17.0.8.1 (Adoptium)
and it works.

I tried to recompile jEdit with that
same JDK and ran jEdit and the test and it also worked.

Did I miss something or maybe someone
fixed the bug already?

As Dale told it seems we will not be
able to upgrade Beanshell because of their licence change so
we have the choice to find another alternative that would be
compatible with GPL (I don't know any), otherwise we might try
to solve the problem ourselves in our version of Beanshell.

--

Matthieu
Casanova

[email protected]

Mer 04 oct 2023, à 22:03, Dale Anson a
écrit :

I believe it's in the same
place it was last year. It isn't hard to upgrade the
integrated beanshell to a newer, java 17+ compatible
version, but there is still the GPL vs Apache license issue
which hasn't been worked out.

On
Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 1:40 PM Robert Schwenn <[email protected] >
wrote:

Hi,

do You have
in mind that there's a issue with integrated
beanshell ( https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4118/ )
not being compatible with java 17 (and presumably
later)? Or is it fixed already (or a mistake)?

Robert

Am
02.10.2023 um 23:27 schrieb Matthieu Casanova:

Hey,

we missed
java 17 and are still on java 11. Java 21 arrived
and it is LTS, I think it would be nice that the
next version of jEdit (after 5.7 release) would be
java 21 which brings a lot of nice features
especially virtual threads.

Anyone
against it ?

Matthieu

--

-----------------------------------------------

jEdit Developers' List

[email protected]

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel

--

-----------------------------------------------

jEdit Developers' List

[email protected]

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Robert Schwenn
Augustusweg 10a
01445 Radebeul
0152 / 26 24 25 97

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Developers' List
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel