Re: Gatekeeper problem in 2.5.1?
Joel Kulesza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.lyx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAGOGw9Gc5Ve6aJP7nYFg16gQv3aWo55g0U2Yrv0AtWxgwLLEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 13:47 Richard Kimberly Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/24/26 12:06 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 09:25 Pavel Sanda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 08:55:46AM +0200, Stephan Witt via lyx-devel >> wrote: >> > >> 2026/04/24 12:10???Koji Yokota <[email protected]>????????????: >> > >> >> > >> But at least this should be explicitly guided, or most of people >> probably cannot find the workaround. >> > > >> > > Well, explanation was already here: >> https://wiki.lyx.org/Mac/Mac#Gatekeeper >> > > >> > > But I wonder if the warning should be eliminated. >> > >> > The warning is from macOS - to avoid it the code signing has to be done >> with a certificate from Apple, AFAIK. >> > >> > This was discussed on the list already. There are pros and cons for >> this move. >> >> Given that you are probably the one whose choice will be respected, >> did you make up your own mind how shall we proceed? >> >> My understanding is that starting this fall our non-notarized way will be >> broken on homebrew and new macOS releases as well. >> >> Pavel >> -- >> lyx-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel > > > Colleagues, > > I recently needed to get an Apple Developer ID to test signing > executables, and so far it works. > > If I can be a help with respect to signing LyX on macaOS, please let me > know. > > Does that mean you could actually sign it for us? > > Riki > I believe so. I’ve only signed things via GitHub CI Actions, but I suspect I can sign manually, and likely also the installer (though I have no experience in this). Please let me know if/how I can help test. Thanks, Joel > -- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel