Introduction to LYX - suggested revision

"Michael Gorman" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.lyx.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear LYX Documentation team,

 

I attach a suggested rewrite of chapter 1, The Philosophy of LYX, which is a
part of the Introduction to LYX document. I have rewritten it because I
believe it does not properly present the arguments for and against the use
of LYX or its modern alternatives.

 

I believe its case against word processors is out of touch with modern
reality; and its case for LYX does not present its advantages correctly.

 

I am but an occasional user of LYX. I am a retired programmer who is now
involved with various voluntary groups, and the associated documents and
spreadsheets. I have used both the Windows and Linux versions of LYX. On my
'main computer' I use Windows and Microsoft Office; on my other computers I
use what came with them or what is cost-free - usually Libre Office.

 

I have copied your first paragraph in section 1.1, but used the Standard
English 'mother' rather than the US vernacular 'mom'. LYX is a product for
many nations, so Standard English is preferred for the English version. The
other sections and paragraphs are my own.

 

Yours sincerely,

Michael Gorman

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
LYX Philosophy.odt (application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text, 9.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.