Re: AGU and EGS layouts

Le 17/02/2018 à 15:01, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
> On Friday, 16 February 2018 10.11.32 WET Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>  > You are right, there is no hurry to remove unusable layouts. Maybe the best
>  > would be to remove these when a layout for agujournal and one for copernicus
>  > (for EGU) are available. It seems to me that agutex.layout can be reused
>  > for agujournal, I will give a try later.
> 
> I have recently looked into copernicus
> 
> https://publications.copernicus.org/for_authors/latex_instructions.html
> 
> and they have this warning:
> 
> "Authors are kindly requested to make use of the template.tex file embedded in 
> the LaTeX Package since most of the definitions for the structure of manuscript 
> elements are described there. Since we convert all typeset TeX files into XML, 
> the expressions and markups have to be highly standardized."

Does that mean that we should provide a Docbook layout ? I guess rather that we 
should be strict about the set of interfaced commands in the layout file.

>  > José, I see that you developed with Martin a layout file and a set of .inc
>  > files for use with DocBook. I guess this is obsolete as well?
> 
> Which ones?

These:

agu-dtd.layout
agu_stdclass.inc
agu_stdcounters.inc
agu_stdlists.inc
agu_stdsections.inc
agu_stdtitle.inc

> 
> The idea, if I remember correctly, about the docbook layout files is to have the 
> same structure as the latex layout files.

Here I must confess that I am not quite familiar with docbook.

-- 
Jean-Pierre