Re: Language-specific replacement for `formatter`

today when I have a file open and I type ^T it runs the formatter or
the linter (depending on the file type).  If I understand correctly, I
can't bind to ^T to restore formatter in a hacky way because it is
already bound by linter.

How would a simple bash script work?  If I'm understanding correctly
I'd have to reimplement the nanorc logic for detecting file types,
which seems a pain when nano already does this for me!

Anthony
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:44 AM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You can write a simple bash script that does language-specific things and that you bind to a single key.
>
> Not sure what you mean by 'bind to a name that already has another meaning'. If you mean that ^T is already bound to another function, then change the binding.
>
> Best,
> Wolfgang
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Sottile [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September, 2018 22:40
> To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] Language-specific replacement for `formatter`
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 1:35 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I am misunderstanding, but you can bind ^R^X... to a key. See:
> >
> > https://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v3/nano.html
> >
> > and search for "If you use such a formatting command regularly".
> >
> > Best,
> > Wolfgang
>
> Right, but I can't do that _per language_, I'd need to have N key
> bindings (and remember each of them separately) for the N languages I
> have formatters for.  Plus I can't bind to a name that already has
> another meaning (I'd want to bind to ^T so I don't have to "oh is this
> a linter or a formatter" each time).
>
> Anthony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Help-nano [mailto:help-nano-bounces+wolfgang.viechtbauer=maastrichtuniversity.nl@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Sottile
> > Sent: Wednesday, 26 September, 2018 21:45
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Help-nano] Language-specific replacement for `formatter`
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:37 PM Anthony Sottile <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:31 AM Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Anthony,
> > > >
> > > > Op 25-09-18 om 22:23 schreef Anthony Sottile:
> > > > > Hi! I've noticed that `formatter` has been removed in nano 3.x,
> > > > > however I've previously found it pretty useful for running things like
> > > > > `go fmt` (or sorting for gitignore for example).
> > > >
> > > > The formatter command was "made" for Go, so that you used it for that
> > > > is no surprise.  But... how often do you need to re-sort a .gitignore
> > > > file?  And if you really need to, how hard is it to type: ^R ^X |sort
> > > > <Enter>?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Any time I'm changing a .gitignore I run this.  And really any time
> > > I'm editing _any_ file I'll instinctively hit ^T to run the formatter
> > > / linter.  `^R^X|sort` is a *lot* to type over and over.
> > > Additionally, if `^R^X` replaces `formatter` surely it also replaces
> > > `linter` but that seems to remain?
> > >
> > > > > Whether I had a formatter or linter I could run ^T and it would
> > > > > usually do what I want.  With the removal of `formatter` from nanorc
> > > > > is there a way to restore that behaviour?
> > > >
> > > > No.  Not now.
> > > >
> > > > > I work on a _ton_ of different file types (20+) so setting up a
> > > > > shortcut for each formatter for each language is really not feasible.
> > > >
> > > > For how many of those syntaxes have you found a useful use of the
> > > > formatter command?  (Judging from your Github stuff, you have nanorc
> > > > files for just four syntaxes, and just one of them contains formatter.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah yeah, those are just the ones I have posted publicly because they
> > > work "universally" on all the machines I install those dotfiles on --
> > > I have 10-15 other nanorc files that I don't have checked in there
> > > (with most of them containing formatters / linters).
> > >
> > > > > I'd be sad to see this feature removed permanently
> > > > >
> > > > > (maybe this is an email asking for restoration of `formatter`)
> > > >
> > > > Then please post a feature request on Savannah:
> > > >   https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=nano
> > > >
> > > > In that request you may want to reference another complaint:
> > > >   https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54651
> > >
> > > It seems that link is exactly what I'm asking for as well, either
> > > restoration of ^T -> `formatter` or an equivalent replacement.  Though
> > > it is marked as `wontfix` :(
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Benno