Re: Nano License
Greg McPherran <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Jan 2025 21:36:51 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.nano.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK, Thank you kindly. Nano is a great tool. I have used heavy IDEs (VS, CLion,..) and on Linux with a good command terminal and shell and nano, I am more productive and spend much less time understanding and configuring my tools. Great editor. (I accidentally used "support" email address in original email, sorry about that). Greg McPherran > On 01/08/2025 11:07 AM EST Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > my understanding of the license > > Which license exactly? What text are you looking at? Presumably > the GPL version three: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html? > > > is that copying and modifying nanorc files (e.g. from /usr/share/nano) that > > are used locally and not distributed to others, is considered an unrestricted > > form of propagation. > > Correct: for your local and personal use, you are free to use and > modify nano in any way you like. To summarize your basic rights: > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html#the-foundations-of-the-gpl > > > The license also speaks of documenting modifications but again I think that > > this does not apply to locally used copies that are used only by me. Can > > confirm? > > Correct: for your personal use, you can do whatever you like. But > if you somehow share your changes with others (multiple users of a > single system maybe), then it's good to document what you changed, > for the benefit of those other users, so that they don't think they > are using an unmodified nano. > > > Benno