Scite/Scintila sluggish? (was Re: Dead end?)
Randy Kramer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.nedit.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 22 March 2009 06:27:57 am Thomas Orgis wrote: > There is the crazy plan to Hack > My Own Thing(tm), as always, possibly starting with the scintilla > widget (if that can be made less sluggish)... or FLTK. I'm curious--under what circumstances do you find scintilla sluggish? I've started to play around with scite, and it passed its first test with flying colors--loading a 10 MB character (also byte in this case) file, and then scrolling through the file using the elevator bar--scrolls as fast as I can move the elevator bar. I've looked into the approach to folding, and, as far as I looked, I like most of what I see--it does folding, it applies a folding level number to each fold (so folding can be hierarchical). On the downside, since I use my own markup language (actually, TWiki with modifications) I will have to write a lexer for that, and most lexers are written in C++ :-( although some are written in Lua iiuc. (And I've now found one lexer for a wiki markup language (haven't tried it yet), but that may be suitable for me to adapt. Also, unless I misunderstand, it already works in Unicode, which means it won't require a conversion at some point down the line--and I'm even more impressed with the speed I've seen because I was worried that the conversion to Unicode would slow (nedit, for example) down. It does have a scripting language named Lua, which might be fine. There is no keyboard recording of macros :-( And, of course, it does not use *tif. Thanks for any additional information you can offer. Randy Kramer -- I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al. -- NEdit Discuss mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss