Re: What could be missing?
Andrew Hood <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:17:39 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.nedit.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeremy wrote:
> My only question is, given you likely have had this information all
> along and that I had described from the very start the weird display
> effects on my laptop, assuming you have been following this thread,
> why did you not volunteer this information earlier and thus help me
> avoid a major waste of time and the grief thereof?
I've never had that particular problem. It was your mention of
XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS that woke up the "leetle gray cells" (thank you
Hercule). On the other hand, a few people had suggested building from
CVS, so you get to share the blame. :-) You can have a copy of my CVS
built with static OpenMotif 2.3.1 if you want to try NEdit without the:
export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
however mine has a "few" differences - beyond Motif version - from the
straight CVS.
Aaron joked:
> Yeah, Andrew dude, where were you when we were all making a fool's attempt
> at problem solving? :-)
:-) Matey, you were asleep too.
Anthony added to the hilarity:
> Yes, this is positively scandalous!
You're right! We should have had a new release ages ago.
Aaron observed:
> This occurs because these visuals manifest differently on different
> chipsets and even versions of graphics chips. I know that some ATI cards
> differed in this even with the same driver.
This box has an ATI card, and I've never seen the problem because I've
always built from CVS.
Andrew
--
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
-- Dr. Who
--
NEdit Discuss mailing list - [email protected]
http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss