Re: [bakefile-devel] Subprojetc question.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hans Van Leemputten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vaclav Slavik" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [bakefile-devel] Subprojetc question.
>
> > Hans Van Leemputten wrote:
> > > Before mailing here I already reported a bakefile bug on the
> > > wxWindows SF page, should I duplicate it on the bakefile SF
> > > page as it is not specific to wxWin?
> >
> > Yes, please. BTW, I think it's not specific to Watcom...
>
> Done, and indeed it is not only Watcom that has this problem.
>
> > > No I understand (well I think I do) what subproject is for and
> > > what the bakefile exe,lib,dll rule is for. The first version of
> > > my bakefile did it the way you suggest above, but there are
> > > some problems doing it this way:=20
> > > - The guidelib and demo dsp file will
> > > both be in the demo directory.=20
> >
> > On the contrary, if you use a subproject, there will be two
> > makefiles.=20 That's the very point of subprojects.
>
> Huh? I guess you misunderstood me... as the bakefile(s) referred to
> here and other snipped points was using the <lib> <exe> rule (in
> one bakefile or with a include statement) and it did *not* use
> <subproject> feature...

No wonder I misunderstood you, see the subject of this thread and what 
you wrote in your first mail:
> The issue; guidelib.bkl has a rule to make the lib and demo.bkl has
> a rule to make the demo.exe, but because demo.bkl depends on the
> guidelib it using 
>    <subproject id="guidelib">
>        <dir>../../</dir>
>        <dependency-of>all</dependency-of>
>    </subproject>
I must admit I'm lost.

> Now how would you write bakefiles for this extended-sample?

Either single makefile with everything, or main makefile with 
submakefiles in subdirectories called through <subproject>.

> guidelib:
>     $(_PUSHCD) ..\..
>     $(MAKE) -f makefile.bcc $(MAKEARGS) all
>     $(_POPCD) ..\..

Thanks!

> > "make clean" does that.
>
> No it does not! 

Indeed, sorry about that. I only looked at autoconf format output 
(which does the right thing) and assumed it was handled generically 
in makefile.bkl. I'll fix it for the next release.

Regards,
vaclav

- -- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKrUYxDYa/UZSZMkRAqgrAJ9GT7wgBjOAqH8VHbBITHQCK+0w6QCgmG/E
NRA9MjL3X3xaVS9Y0y6tsdw=
=DNml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click