Re: [documancer] Re: [documancer-users] a few bugs?

Vaclav Slavik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.poedit.user
Message-ID <200401101518.38861.vaclav.slavik__29625.2502165318$1077449218@matfyz.cz>
[email protected] wrote:
>   <SEARCH>::<book_identifier_no_or_string>::<search_text>
> would allow for generalizations to other commands,
> such as previous/next hit and succh)
> The other option I can think of is to send the above as separate
> lines SEARCH
>   <book_identifier_no_or_string>
>   <search_text>

I prefer the latter because it doesn't involve any additonal parsing 
-- for example, you don't have to worry about search requests or book 
names that contain "::"...

VS

-- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAAAm+xDYa/UZSZMkRAi/xAJ97l0i2FUNRo+IKmKYZ2wRj7NDU7gCgk3HP
f+zBvelFbvqOHjGtho2BfSY=
=8LDW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.