Re: [poedit-users] ANN: Poedit 1.4.0_pre1 pre-release

Cristian Secară <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:34:50 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.editors.poedit.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:20:07 +0100, Vaclav Slavik wrote:

> [...]
> On the other hand, the new approach (bold font = untranslated,
> italics font = fuzzy):
> So the next pre-release will use bold font for these too, but
> differentiate it with different _text_ (not background) color.
> [...]
> Maybe it should use dark blue for untranslated text too, I'm not 
> sure -- as long as it's only slightly off the standard color 
> (typically black), it shouldn't carry any of the problems mentioned 
> above with it.

Well, I guess that color text would be also fine.
As for what colors, dark blue for untranslated is ok, but what
color will be then for fuzzy ?
Perhaps a program user preference for color selection should satisfy
most users, only that this involves some work on preferences dialog.
Something like "select color A for untranslated strings" and "select
color B for fuzzy strings".
Perhaps also something like "select font [style] for untranslated
strings" and "select font [style] for fuzzy strings" :)

Regarding the color versus no color, I think there is something rather
psychological. When I open a .po file and see a lot of colored lines
there, it makes me feel angry and want to eliminate as many color lines
as I can. With no color at all, even if bold, I suspect there will be
no such great feel like working on ... but of course, this is only a
personal feeling.

Cristi

-- 
Cristian Secară
http://www.secarica.ro/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Poedit-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/poedit-users