Re: More on extending Pollo

On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 23:26, Al Byers wrote:
> I have greatly refactored my AG101 product 
> (http://ag101.sourceforge.net, but the changes are not up there) so that 
> it requires the fewest possible changes to Pollo base code. I have 
> attached a document with those changes.

Thanks for this convenient list!

>  They are mostly changes to 
> permissions and adding noarg constructors so that things can be 
> extended. The biggest architectural problem for me was that fact that 
> PolloFrame instantiates Pollo in its declarations. I ended up passing 
> the instance of Pollo (or its subclass) to PolloFrame (or its subclass), 
> but there is probably a better way.

I'm on holiday next week so I don't have time to look at it immediately,
but I'll certainly take the time once I get back.

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
[email protected]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com