| Newsgroups |
gmane.editors.sed.user |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Not a big deal, but I agree it would make sense to change the behavior
so that Q prints any scheduled text, since 1) Q was apparently modeled
after d (which prints scheduled text), and 2) it can be argued that the
decision to schedule was already made and should be honored.
Daniel
On 5/28/2015 2:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Adding again the GNU sed maintainer. This is also correct---and
> unintended, because Q *should have* printed scheduled text.
>
> I think it would make sense to make an incompatible change, but that's
> up to the maintainer.
>
> Paolo
>