Re: Are the conversion options between programming languages and TeXmacs unwanted?

 > In my point of view, these conversion options to different languages 
can be removed, or, as an alternative, can be summarized as "export to 
code file".

I agree with you. Feel free to submit a pull request.

On 2020/3/28 下午11:17, Yue, Xiang wrote:
> Hi，
>
> I'm an applicant of GSoC 2020 and I was trying some import/export 
> options. (just some ready-ups for improvement). The options read that 
> I can convert my TeXmacs doc to programming language source code, like 
> C++, Scala or something. But I don't know what the differences between 
> these.
> However I tried to export .cpp, .py and .java file. The only 
> difference that I found is about their file suffixes, and everything 
> in export content is the same.
> Actually I don't know what's the relationship between TeXmacs and 
> programming languages. I think the truth is that TeXmacs regards the 
> conversion as "convert to plain text".
> In my point of view, these conversion options to different languages 
> can be removed, or, as an alternative, can be summarized as "export to 
> code file".
>
> Best regards,
> Xiang
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev