Re: S7 vs. Guile
Massimiliano Gubinelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.texmacs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear all, I've managed to find few subtle bugs and now TeXmacs/S7 seems to run fine (there is still a bug I'm aware of but you can give a look if you want). Anyway, I've still to reorganise the changes and test it more. You can find it here: https://github.com/mgubi/texmacs/tree/s7/src <https://github.com/mgubi/texmacs/tree/s7/src> in the README.md file you find also the results of running some r7rs benchmarks against S7 and Guile 1.8, Guile 3.0.4. Based on them I still expect to be able to have better performance of TeXmacs/S7 vs. TeXmacs/Guile1.8. Currenlty the startup time for TeXmacs is 4x faster, but compiling the full user manual (~120 pages) takes 20 sec for S7 and 15 sec for Guile 1.8. So there is still some performance problems. This is still experimental, not ready for everyday use in any way, but looks promising. Best, Max > On 4. Jan 2021, at 11:29, Massimiliano Gubinelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > I've been making some progress on testing S7 with TeXmacs. Now performance is good and most editing works ok but I still have some bugs which I have to correct. Boot time is ~4x faster. As soon as everything works correctly I plan to run some more benchmarks to see how much we can gain. > > In the meantime I finished to run standard Scheme benchmarks for Guile 1.8.8, Guile 3.0.4 and S7 on my machine. The one which is slower is Guile 1.8.8 and sometimes the benchmarks kills the process because it is taking too much time (CRASHED). These are the results (in seconds). > > Best > Max > > > test S7 G1.8.8 G3.0.4 > > browse 24.27 80.32 12.060597 > deriv 25.194 61.39 18.581995 > destruc 52.077 CRASHED 7.143701 > diviter 9.685 77.85 15.453743 > divrec 11.803 78.55 17.41294 > puzzle 27.716 191.35 18.086531 > triangl 33.931 98.16 8.519252 > tak 12.925 134.2 4.757643 > takl 20.968 CRASHED 9.456034 > ntakl 17.073 CRASHED 9.516082 > cpstak 103.358 221.03 59.444873 > ctak 44.139 CRASHED CRASHED > fib 10.218 195.78 12.090909 > fibc 25.799 CRASHED CRASHED > fibfp 1.885 45.98 22.001634 > sum 6.637 281.63 6.866215 > sumfp 2.499 105.1 42.058511 > fft 32.198 CRASHED 7.685201 > mbrot 24.403 CRASHED 50.086067 > mbrotZ 18.556 CRASHED 67.011491 > nucleic 19.946 67.46 15.347245 > pi NO CRASHED 0.564552 > pnpoly 17.981 CRASHED 24.886723 > ray 20.455 CRASHED 18.51229 > simplex 46.344 CRASHED 13.895531 > ack 10.572 CRASHED 8.413945 > array1 11.483 160.88 9.241778 > string 1.714 1.82 1.872806 > sum1 0.47 1.63 4.427402 > cat 1.187 CRASHED 28.396944 > tail 1.188 CRASHED 9.821691 > wc 8.266 57.91 16.963138 > read1 406 0.95 5.804979 > compil/ 41.155 CRASHED 5.149011 > conform 51.031 CRASHED 10.508732 > dynamic 22.736 69.58 7.374259 > earley CRASHED CRASHED 9.489885 > graphs 127.611 CRASHED 23.026826 > lattice 139.275 292.7 15.937364 > matrix 72.073 CRASHED 9.881781 > maze 23.258 CRASHED 4.70391 > mazefun 19.51 129.61 9.664338 > nqueens 55.11 CRASHED 19.372148 > paraff/ 31.424 CRASHED 4.24542 > parsing 39.443 CRASHED 10.687959 > peval 29.677 98.91 15.644764 > primes 7.73 39.33 7.521318 > quicks/ 93.996 CRASHED 13.252736 > scheme 71.462 CRASHED 15.142413 > slatex 32.069 48.96 45.047143 > chudno/ NO CRASHED 0.306648 > nboyer 39.274 151.42 5.10214 > sboyer 31.537 168.81 4.755798 > gcbench 20.54 CRASHED 3.511493 > mperm 173.33 CRASHED 10.650118 > equal 781 CRASHED CRASHED > bv2str/ 10.782 CRASHED 4.489627 _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev