Re: debian package for bullseye

Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.texmacs.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the info.

G.

On 11.02.21 10:13, denis Raux wrote:
> Hello,
> guile 1.8 vanished from the repositories because it’s relies on many other packages and compiler versions which have been removed too. So simply added it on the source tree won’t fix the problem.
> We are currently working on the Guile 1.6 intégration in the source package, because it  requests less dependencies and would be enough for Texmacs needs.
>
> Denis
>
>> On 10 Feb 2021, at 23:33, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.01.2021 um 21:43 schrieb kamaraju kusumanchi:
>>> Could you please provide a texmacs package for bullseye (current
>>> testing distribution of Debian)?
>>>
>> Dear raju,
>>
>> I am not  a developer, but a user. Said this, I feel that being part of the repository would be good for TeXmacs and I have a question on this.
>>
>> As far as I know, TeXmacs is not in the repositories because it relies on Guile 1.8, which conflicts with the version of Guile which is in the repositories. What could be a way to work around this? Would it be possible and enough to "bundle" Guile 1.8 inside TeXmacs so that it does not interfere with other packages?
>>
>> Giovanni
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Texmacs-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.