Re: Remark on Guile 3.0.8

Sorry Philippe,
 I misinterpreted your message. Thanks for the heads up about it. 

However it seems guile 2.2 is working: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-10/msg00016.html

This is not enough for us. Guile 2.2 is not fast enough in interpreted mode. 

It maybe possible to have a working port of Guile 3, maybe with some features turned off.

Max




> On 25. Jan 2022, at 10:11, Massimiliano Gubinelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Philippe,
> 
>  I do not have currently any Windows installation in which to test. I think this branch was created by Darcy, maybe you should check with him what is the status. 
> 
> Darcy?
> 
> Max
> 
> 
>> On 25. Jan 2022, at 09:36, Philippe Joyez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Max,
>> 
>> In the guile git repo, there is a wip-mingw branch (last commit past
>> August), but according to a recent thread in the guile-devel mailing
>> list
>> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-10/msg00006.html)
>> and https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/3298 , it still does
>> not work.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Philippe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Texmacs-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
> 


_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev