Re: Difficult macro parameters - removing the implicit document tag

Sam Liddicott <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.texmacs.user
Message-ID <CAOj-5WA+_AQFmAwSG3D1u-1_aO=N15emPant9ygUHCP3Rks_bw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the tip on the forum, I didn't know about that.

I have found I can fix many of the macros to prevent insertion of implicit
document tags by "copy to texmacs" and then paste in a text editor, to
convert from:

<assign|map-paragraphs|<\macro|x>

<compound|<if|<provides|<merge|map-paragraphs-|<get-label|<arg|x>>>>|<merge|map-paragraphs-|<get-label|<arg|x>>>|map-paragraphs-default->|<arg|x>>
</macro>>

to

<assign|map-paragraphs|<macro|x|<compound|<if|<provides|<merge|map-paragraphs-|<get-label|<arg|x>>>>|<merge|map-paragraphs-|<get-label|<arg|x>>>|map-paragraphs-default->|<arg|x>>>>

and then copy and "paste from texmacs" -- and this prevents my macros from
adding back as many document tags as it was taking away :-)

Sam

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 19:56, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 12/02/24 17:56, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> > It's incredible the number of hours I spent over the last week because
> > of the difficulty in getting texmacs to remove the default document
> > tag from a macro definition/invocation.
> >
> > I can trick it into not happening ...
>
>
> I also think the documentation on entering source code is one of the
> weak points of TeXmacs.
>
> For the rest of your---very interesting---messages sorry, I do not know
> enough to be able to say anything. Possibly there are people that read
> the forum but do not read the mailing list, so it may be worth posting
> there too (http://forum.texmacs.cn/)
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.