Re: [vim/vim] Combine highlighting for `numhl` when using multiples signs (Issue #16842)

ccjmne left a comment (vim/vim#16842)

If I understand correctly, this request essentially asks for any higher- or equal-priority sign that currently would overwrite all properties (though specifically `text`/`texthl` vs `numhl` of a lower-priority sign, to instead "patch" its highlights onto the previous ones.

The idea would be to have a `text`+`texthl`-only sign work together with a `numhl` sign. This [request](https://github.com/airblade/vim-gitgutter/issues/863) [is](https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/issues/23#issuecomment-251499828) [popular](https://github.com/yegappan/lsp/issues/385). I think it could be sensible.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/16842#issuecomment-5110776614
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <vim/vim/issues/16842/[email protected]>

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/vim/vim/issues/16842/5110776614%40github.com.