Re: [vim/vim] Add option to disable q: (Issue #21110)
Shay Hill (Vim Github Repository) <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.vim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <vim/vim/issues/21110/[email protected]> |
ShayHill left a comment (vim/vim#21110) > What I'm getting at is, q already knows how to instantly prioritize stopping a macro recording over waiting for more of the built in `q:`/`q/`/`q?` sequence, so what if that same kind of priority applied to user mappings (as a settable option or something) too? ... I think this kind of fix might be worth considering. It feels less like "messing with built in stuff" and more like fixing a gap in how q disambiguates against user maps. I think you 99% *don't* want that, because this disambiguation means you couldn't go into command-line mode during a macro even if you wanted to (try it). That's not much of a sacrifice, but applying such rules all over the place would make things frustrating. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/21110#issuecomment-5379965299 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <vim/vim/issues/21110/[email protected]> -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/vim/vim/issues/21110/5379965299%40github.com.