[Discussion] GitHub as the canonical source or not

Sukima <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.vim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Recently there has been a percolating trend to be concerned over GitHub. 
Specifically the
Give up GitHub <https://sfconservancy.org/GiveUpGitHub/> plea.

Since Vim is a FOSS project I was curious what the community thought about 
this.

   1. Pros/Cons?
   2. Is the Vim License worded well enough to weather any CoPilot bubble?
   3. Do the tools compare to other contribution models?
   4. How do other FOSS projects approach the monolithic use of GH?
   5. Other praises or concerns?

To quote the famous “Coffee Talk” SNL skit… “talk amongst yourselves.”

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/fb9ebb03-14cb-4baa-88b6-e0724e294570n%40googlegroups.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.