Re: why is neovim such a sad thing?

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 05:28:47PM +0300, Riza Dindir wrote:
> I can not say neovim is a bad thing. I do not have bad feelings towards emacs,

emacs is great if you're found of their point of view (I'm not but I
fully understand). I really think *neovim* is a bad thing in a long run
because it's just vim incompatible with vim because of bad decisions
(Or please someone prove me wrong by showing me at least 1 thing worth
enough to split the community into 2 separated things which is the
most notable change neovim came with).

> Acme editor is something that I am fond of too, but have no use for, since I am
> not on Plan9. But having text and being able to run that text is nice. There
> are ports of acme, but vim is sufficient for all my development, and editing
> requirements.

same here: I love the idea but I'm so used to vim and I really think
mouse gestures doesn't compete a 105 bullets machine gun magazine.

> The video that Mark Chantreux has given a link to is really helpful and nice.
> Thank you for the link.

glad you liked! thanks for this feedback. An improved version (then a
french one) is scheduled too.

regards.

-- 
Marc Chantreux

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/Z-gLoBMuvR3xejnO%40prometheus.