Re: [VOTE] Change in CIS project structure

+1

Shiva


> My personal circumstances are currently somewhat different to how they
> were when this group was started. I no longer find I have the time to
> focus on the management and coordination of CIS. This has manifested
> itself with a lack of attention from myself and a consequent reduction
> of productivity.
>
> One of the reasons for this withdrawal is because of the success of
> another project I am involved with. This has been proposed as a member
> of the CIS group (see other thread).
>
> Last week I had a meeting with Allan Samaroo who has recently shown
> considerable interest in driving CIS forward. Allan also sourced three
> of the machines in the CIS lab right at the start of this excercise.
> Allan has agreed to do what he can to breath new life into CIS.
>
> Therefore, I am proposing some changes to the structure of CIS:
>
> 1) Karen Lequay is named as having a veto. However, Karen has not been
> active here for some time. Therefore I feel her veto should be revoked.
>
> 2) I am no longer able to actively commit to the central CIS project,
> consequently I propose that my veto be revoked. I wish to remain a
> member of this community and will still use my vote. However, I do not
> feel it is appropriate to maintain my veto.
>
> 3) Nissan Dookeran was one of the original proponents of this project.
> He will shortly be returning to Trinidad and Tobago and I would
> encourage you to keep him on board and allow him to retain his veto.
> However, Nissan is currently fairly inactive here due to commitments in
> Barbados.
>
> 4) Allan Samaroo should be awarded a veto in my place since he is active.
>
> Of course I vote +1 to all these. This is a simple amjority vote and
> lazy consensus applies.
>
> Ross
>
>