Re: Promoting the CIS initiative.. and some other noise
Ross Gardler <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:49:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.cis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LYRIS-221309-1089821-2004.10.31-08.49.39--gec-cis#[email protected]> |
Vidyaratha Kissoon wrote: > Could you clarify that the current projects in which we have an interest > in are :- > i) Development of burrokeet and I will respond to this part of your question so that things are totally clear: Burrokeet is an Open Source Software Project. It is currently licensed under the MIT license which is the most permissive of Open Source licenses available (i.e. no restrictions - not even a requirement for attribution). The copyrights are owned by my company here in the UK. However, both these situations will change in the near(ish) future. The license will change to something like the Apache license (the only restriction that this adds is the requirement for attribution). The copyright holder will become a major non-profit Open Source organisation. When this will happen I cannot say as I don't know. I and the other developer on Burrokeet are members of CIS and therefore Burrokeet is a member of CIS. How much backing CIS puts into Burrokeet is up to CIS itself. However, I am keen for the project to remain affiliated with CIS at all times, but CIS will not *own* the project, it must, for legal reasons, be owned by an incorporated body. As I said at this time that is my (for profit) company, I appreciate that this is not an ideal situation, but I am working on moving it into a suitable non-profit organisation at the earliest opportunity. The more of a community I can develop around Burrokeet the more realistic are the opportunities for entering an organisation like Apache or the Eclipse Foundation. Ross Dgroups is a joint initiative of Bellanet, DFID, Hivos, ICA, IICD, OneWorld, UNAIDS and World Bank --- You are currently subscribed to cis as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-cis-221309I-T6/[email protected]