[Fwd: Re resigning CIS]
Allan Samaroo <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:37:18 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.cis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LYRIS-221309-1275467-2004.12.19-22.38.14--gec-cis#[email protected]> |
Forwarded as requested by Ross. I guess it has been understated in the past but let me point out that all members of the CIS initiative are equally important. I've never thought of myself or anyone being above anyone else. I therefore feel we are losing a critical part of our community with Ross' resignation. Ross, like you, our door open should you need any assistance, and we'll try to provide it as best as we can. Allan. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re resigning CIS Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:52:48 +0000 From: Ross Gardler <[email protected]> To: Allan Samaroo <[email protected]> Allan, (this is a private mail since I am no longer on the CIS list, however, please forward to the CIS list, it is important from a community development point of view. Please do so without editing or comment, at least within the first forwarded mail) I wish to be perfectly clear that my current personal mood has nothing to do with my comments on leaving CIS. I had previously decided that I would leave the list if I again felt that my position was stated as being incorrect, rather than being questioned in a constructive manner. It so happens that this has coincided with other more important things in my life, but please be under no illusions that my decision to leave under these circumstances had been made weeks ago. That being said, it is also important that you understand that my words are not intended to impart any blame. I have learnt that when a personal clash is consistent within a group it is prudent for one of the partners in that repeated clash to withdraw. Since I am the *least* important person to CIS at this point in time and I *am* a part of a clash (or possibly the cause) then I must resign. This is not meant as a personal comment about any individual (myself or anyone else) it is simply a recognition of a situation that exists an an appropriate action to try address that issue. I have no doubt that you are sincere when you say you're intentions are to discuss. I also have no doubt that you are one of the most productive members of the CIS group. I have not forgotten who donated the most hardware to the original lab, in fact all the equipment came from just four people, unfortunately you are the only remaining active member. It saddens me that your response to my resignation implies that my words were aimed *at* you. This was not my intention, I wish to support you in what you are trying to do, and my departure should not be seen as anything other than a continuation of that support. Sometimes, to be productive one has to cut away the dead wood. I have identified *myself* as the deadwood, not CIS itself, and this is how CIS members should interpret my resignation. I will *not* be returning to CIS, I do not feel my presence would be helpful. However, my offer to assist remains open. If you choose to use Burrokeet that is my best channel of assistance, I am researcher and a developer not a social engineer and since I am not West Indian I cannot be a part of a social engineering project in the West Indies. Ross Visit the CIS Project on the WWW: http://www.cis.org.tt View the offlist archives: http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.education.cis ------------------------------------------------- Dgroups is a joint initiative of Bellanet, DFID, Hivos, ICA, IICD, OneWorld, UNAIDS and World Bank --- You are currently subscribed to cis as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-cis-221309I-T6/[email protected]