Re: From a distinguished journal. Triple blind reviews seem effective

I believe a third group!

Dan

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:59 AM david meadows <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Interesting... So who chooses whom the paper is sent to for review?
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019, 8:04 AM DANIEL P. Tompkins, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Triple blind should disable the built in bias of all parties, from what I
> > understand.  Here's a summary from Wiley
> > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wiley.com%2Fnetwork%2Fresearchers%2Fbeing-a-peer-reviewer%2Fexploring-the-peer-review-process&amp;data=02%7C01%7CCLASSICS-L%40lsv.uky.edu%7C0da12433242b42d85c5308d6d8704403%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636934374024768092&amp;sdata=SloR4MNIn24Bn1jjli48EIYExsFHSP9imZ7Y%2F8e7%2FoE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >
> > :
> >
> > Another variation on the theme of closed review is triple blind review
> > whereby, not only are authors and reviewers blind to each other’s
> > identities but where editors are also blind to the identity of both. This
> > is aimed at minimizing bias among editors but does not eliminate the
> > possibility of identifying authors by their work or of bias against
> > competing work. Again, there is little evidence that it is used commonly
> > and it requires journals which can afford the administrative staff and
> > processes.
> >
> > I first learned of it from Daniel Nexon while he edited ISQ and he wrote
> a
> > longer summary of what triple-blind entails.  In our small field, it's a
> > way to avoid the trap of an entirely decent editor giving material to
> > entirely decent people he or she knows to review: intentional bias need
> not
> > be present to perpetuate bias, if all the ducks are lined up in this way.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:48 AM david meadows <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What about other marginalized groups?
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019, 6:04 PM DANIEL P. Tompkins, <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >         Int'l Studies Qrtly (@ISQ_Jrnl)
> > > > 5/13/19, 3:31 PM
> > > > All of the manuscripts published in ⁦‪@ISQ_Jrnl‬⁩'s first 2 issues
> were
> > > > submitted under triple blind review. 50% of 63/1 are (co)authored by
> > > female
> > > > authors. We'd love to keep this rate up, but it depends on the number
> > of
> > > > submissions we get from female authors! #womenalsoknowstuff
> > > >
> > > > Download the Twitter app
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> >
>