Oh no, someone else has been at the Voynich manuscript ... but wait ...

Ralph Hancock <[email protected]> Thu, 16 May 2019 03:32:14 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.education.classics
Message-ID	<CALBWZwZJSdhGy-_STq1MNjOHUeLTPQVbjcTDjJ=7XoEiWbgVjA@mail.gmail.com>

Yet another interpretation of the notorious Voynich manuscript:

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F02639904.2019.1599566&amp;data=02%7C01%7CCLASSICS-L%40lsv.uky.edu%7Cf5fd2cc8c5dc4617ae8b08d6d9a6bd4c%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636935707496621010&amp;sdata=D79hVUabmDScpso3Sf8AEoq6Rdneg4e4Yv1WrJxi7BU%3D&amp;reserved=0

This is strangely convincing. I had always thought that the manuscript was
a huge and laborious hoax. But I will have to have another look at the
article in the cold light of day and see if I was carried away by a
persuasive interpretation.

RH