Re: Oh no, someone else has been at the Voynich manuscript ... but wait ...
Ralph Hancock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.classics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALBWZwZu_1aXyHovHw0HNpnrTM+6Px0WPEru8p=PRQKt6-G8ag@mail.gmail.com> |
I cross-posted the conversation to another discussion group, and had the following replies. ----- It's an attractive theory because it's simple, arguing that the MS is just mundane stuff, not arcane and secret knowledge. We also need to remember that languages and dialects were far more local then and in backwaters dialects could develop in completely different directions from their larger parent language. Italy, divided politically and geographically, is plausible in this case -- after all a form of ancient Greek survived as a spoken language in parts of the south into modern times. That said, the claim still needs to be evidenced. ----- "Proto Romance" of necessity existed. How else do we get from Late Latin to French, Italian etc. But such is the low level of literacy, and the stranglehold of Latin, where do we see it ever written? For instance, Old French texts are uncommon before the Millennium -- the Oaths of Strasbourg, Ste Eulalie, and we are into the eleventh and twelfth centuries. The continent never had England's rich vernacular culture. ----- RH