Re: Oh no, someone else has been at the Voynich manuscript ... but wait ...

Yes, of course what I just wrote is speculation. I was arguing against the
genuineness of the manuscript, and trying to do so by speculating on why
and how it could be faked. The 'forger' -- which I am using in quotes in
case by some small chance the thing might be genuine -- may have salted his
fake with a few comprehensible sentences, and yes, there are a few whole
sentences that Cheshire has 'decoded' -- see the original article. I think
you have missed the point of my last remark.

RH