Vs: [CLASSICS-L] Cicero, De natura deorum; numbering question
Ivo Volt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.classics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <VI1PR02MB40001193C59920EC58CD1AD48ACD0@VI1PR02MB4000.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> |
Dear Caroline, Thank you so much! I had noticed a remark on this regarding Cicero's Academica, but good to know this applies to all of his works. Thank you also for the reference; will check it! All the best, Ivo ________________________________ Saatja: Classical Greek and Latin Discussion Group <[email protected]> Caroline Bishop <[email protected]> nimel Saadetud: laupäev, 13. juuli 2019 17:46 Adressaat: [email protected] Teema: Re: [CLASSICS-L] Cicero, De natura deorum; numbering question Dear Ivo, In every work by Cicero, the longer chapters are the product of Janus Gruter, who published an edition of all the works in 1618, while the shorter ones are the product of an edition by Alexander Scot from 1588. John Glucker wrote a very interesting article in which he puzzled this out: "Chapter and Verse in Cicero," Grazer Beiträge 11 (1984): 3-12 All the best, Caroline On Sat, Jul 13, 2019, 9:14 AM Ivo Volt <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear list, > > I have a minor but important (to me) question about the numbering of > paragraphs and chapters in Cicero's De natura deorum: could anyone tell me > from which early editions the two standard numbering systems that are in > use derive? I have looked at some of the major modern editions for clues > but this is probably considered a common knowledge by the editors. Could > one be from Stephanus, as is common with other works? > > Best, > > Ivo Volt > University of Tartu, Estonia > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019, 9:14 AM Ivo Volt <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear list, > > I have a minor but important (to me) question about the numbering of > paragraphs and chapters in Cicero's De natura deorum: could anyone tell me > from which early editions the two standard numbering systems that are in > use derive? I have looked at some of the major modern editions for clues > but this is probably considered a common knowledge by the editors. Could > one be from Stephanus, as is common with other works? > > Best, > > Ivo Volt > University of Tartu, Estonia >