Re: The turned-down way of speaking

"James H. Dee" <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:43:28 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.education.classics
Message-ID <CAOdkGFs3yrWKdM=HauxWKEdyLAFFqoDOhSV4RCgcnC3MJJ6BHQ@mail.gmail.com>
"Turned-down" is indeed translationese nonsense; for rhetorical terms, the
modern entry-point is Lausberg's monumental *Handbuch*, ed. 4, where pp.
456-460 divide *oratio* into 3 parts: *or. soluta* (Pars. 916-920), *or.
perpetua* (921-922) & *periodos* (923-947).  *Or. perp*. corresponds to *lexis
eiromenê* & *periodos* to *lexis katestrammenê* (p. 458), or *oratio vincta
atque contexta*.  (Sidebar: How many in the Group have noticed his
hyper-Teutonic *Inhaltsverzeichnis*, which (depending on how one counts)
reaches (p. 19) 13 or 14 indented subdivisions, with entries squeezed to
the far right of the page?)
JDee

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 3:54 PM Ralph Hancock <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thank you very much. Will pass on your comment to the original enquirer.
>
> RH
>