BMCR 2009.06.02: Biella on Sannibale, La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi, Parte II: Bronzi e materiali vari. Musei Vaticani, Museo Gregoriano Etrusco, Cataloghi, 4/2

Maurizio Sannibale (ed.), La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi, Parte II:
Bronzi e materiali vari. Musei Vaticani, Museo Gregoriano Etrusco,
Cataloghi, 4/2.  Roma:  L'Erma di Bretschneider, 2008.  Pp. 374.  ISBN
978-88-8265-432-X.  EUR 235.00.

Reviewed by Maria Cristina Biella, Rome ([email protected])
Word count:  1256 words
-------------------------------
To read a print-formatted version of this review, see
http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-06-02.html
To comment on this review, see
http://www.bmcreview.org/2009/06/20090602.html
-------------------------------

In the chapter of his book dedicated to Civitavecchia George Dennis
asserted: "It does not appear that an Etruscan town occupied this site.
Yet relics of that antiquity are preserved here, some in the Town-hall,
mostly from Corneto, and some in the house of Signor Guglielmi, an
extensive proprietor of land in the Roman Maremma".[[1]]

The Guglielmi collection was an outcome of extensive archaeological
research carried out in Vulci in the first decades of the 19th
century.[[2]] In 1900 hereditary issues led to its division between two
brothers, Giulio and Giacinto. One portion of it went to Benedetto
Guglielmi, Giulio's son; donated by him to Pope Pius IX in 1935, it was
studied a few years later by J.D. Beazley and F. Magi.[[3]] The
remaining items were transferred from Civitavecchia to Rome and kept in
the family's house in Via del Gesu\.[[4]]

In 1987 Benedetto Guglielmi's heirs sold their archaeological
collection, comprising 416 objects, to the Vatican State, which had the
opportunity to acquire it thanks to the intervention of some private
sponsors. In 1989 an exhibition was organized by the Vatican Museums in
order to present to the public and the scholarly world a first and
preliminary publication: a catalogue of the most relevant objects and a
complete inventory of the collection.[[5]] On that occasion Francesco
Buranelli stated his intention to display and publish the entire
collection. A first study appeared in 1997 and concerned the
pottery.[[6]] The book under review here covers the bronzes and other
materials in the collection and brings the total scientific endeavor to
an end. This very fact--the completion of such a project-- is certainly
an achievement. Systematic study of old collections can be a burdensome
task, but their publication is of primary importance for the knowledge
of past researches and consequently also for the planning of new ones.

Maurizio Sannibale is both the author of a substantial part of the book
and its editor. Other contributors to the research are Brian Benjamin
Shefton (pottery), Antonella Testa (candelabra and incense burners),
Giancarlo Alteri (coins) and Ulderico Santamaria and Fabio Morresi
(metal alloy analyses). The objects are catalogued according to the
different classes of material: figured bronzes (pp. 19-36), terracotta
objects (pp. 37-39), the instrumentum (in which metal vases are
included) (pp. 43-210),  weapons and horse harnesses (pp. 213-233),
objects related to dress and ornament (pp. 237-271), and coins (pp.
275-278). A final chapter is dedicated to the brief analysis of some
modern objects (pp. 281).

A detailed tripartite entry is devoted to each item.  Technical data
are included first, followed by a description of the object and
concluding with its analysis and interpretation.  Certainly thanks to
his long work experience in the conservation laboratories of the
Vatican Museums, Sannibale pays great attention to the first part.
There, for instance, the specifics of the alloy are mentioned.  Each
metal object was analyzed with the XRF technique. Another interesting
feature is the systematic inclusion in the catalogue of the pertinent
weights. To my knowledge, this is the first time that such a detail is
consistently taken into account in a publication of Etruscan and Italic
bronze artefacts and I do believe that this procedure, if
systematically applied in the future, could open up interesting avenues
of research.  Just consider the possibility of studying the weights of
votive bronze statuettes, which could shed light, for instance, on some
specific aspects of manufacture.  I think moreover that this
information could also be useful toward understanding economic aspects
of both the production and the selling of the objects. It is in fact
important to remember that the act of depositing bronze vessels in a
tomb meant the definitive removal from circulation of some--and
sometimes great--quantity of metal. The question is different, of
course, if we deal with bronzes or metal objects that were dedicated in
a sanctuary: their removal from the market can to some extent be
considered temporary.

The careful technical analysis carried out by the author is helpful
toward understanding  aspects of production. To cite just two examples:
The oinochoai nos. 63-66 (pp. 110-114) are not made from sheet bronze,
like the great majority of Etruscan bronze vessels, but are cast. The
patina on the brazier's feet nos. 89- 90 "which extends also to the
break surfaces of both fragments, indicates that it formed during their
deposition, and it is therefore proof of ancient fragmentation...The
analogous break of the foot in the following entry (no. 90)...suggests
at the same time the intentional break-up of bronzes meant to be melted
down" (pp.148 f.).
At the end of the entry, the bibliography on each object is mostly
limited to the inventory list provided by Buranelli in 1989.[[7]]  The
majority of the artefacts presented in this catalogue can thus be
considered published for the first time in this book.

The reader is also able to appreciate each single object thanks to
accurate drawings and photographs.

The possibility of studying in a single context the two Guglielmi
collections is a most valuable feature of this work, since the finds
are the outcome of the same archaeological investigations and their
dispersal was due to hereditary issues. This was indeed the purpose
behind the reassembly of some objects.   Consider, for instance, the
following artefacts: basin no. 27 (whose handles were in the Giacinto
Guglielmi collection and the body in the Benedetto Guglielmi
collection), oinochoe no. 35 (its body was part of the Giacinto
Guglielmi collection and the foot in the Benedetto Guglielmi one),
brazier no. 88 (the body was part of the Benedetto Guglielmi collection
and the connections of the handles were in the Giacinto Guglielmi
collection), helmet no. 136 (the main body was in the Giacinto
Guglielmi lot and the cannulae in the Benedetto Guglielmi lot).
Sannibale tried to take further advantage of this opportunity,
providing in the appendix "Looking at Vulci through a collection" (pp.
289-297) an interpretation of the production history of the Etruscan
city of Vulci through the analysis of the two collections. This is
surely a praiseworthy attempt, as stated by the author: "Anche la
casualita\ puo\ produrre un campione statistico" (p. 289). {Even chance
can produce a statistical sample}

An index listing concordances with the inventory and the preliminary
publication of the collection by Francesco Buranelli completes the
book.

The accuracy of this volume is surely not affected by a few
bibliographical oversights. I noted the following: On p. 96 in the
bibliography to no. 54, instead of "Buranelli 108, n. 76" read
"Buranelli 1989, p. 108, n. 76"; in the footnote 403 p. 104 for
"Bouloumie/ 1973" read "Bouloumie/ 1973a"; in footnote 641 on p. 133
for "Civilta\ degli Etruschi 1955, p. 301 n. 17.21.7"  read "Civilta\
degli Etruschi 1985, p. 301, n. 11.21.7"; on p. 142 in the bibliography
to no. 86, and on p. 143 in the bibliography to no. 87 for "Buranelli
1987" read "Buranelli 1989".

I venture a remark on the short chapter "Indagini sulla composizione
della lega metallica" (pp. 283-288). As an archaeologist, I would have
liked to find some bibliographical references, in order to better
understand the techniques employed.

Finally I would like to mention an interesting initiative of the
publisher: a great part of the work can be found in Google Books.
Considering the high price of the volume ([euro  ] 235,00), I do
believe that on-line publication is definitely a good opportunity for
readers to make a first acquaintance with this interesting publication,
which is not only a well-made catalogue of a 19th century collection,
but also a true mine of ideas for further research.[[8]]


------------------
Notes:


1.   G. Dennis, The Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria, II, London 1848,
pp. 2 f.

2.   For a description of this eventful season of researches see F.
Buranelli, Gli scavi a Vulci della Societa\ Vincenzo Campanari--Governo
Pontificio (1835-1837), Roma 1991, pp. 5 ff. and F. Buranelli in F.
Buranelli (ed.), La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi I, La ceramica, Citta\
del Vaticano 1997, pp. 16 f.

3.   J.D. Beazley, F. Magi, La collezione Benedetto Guglielmi nel Museo
Gregoriano Etrusco, 1-2, Roma 1939-1941.

4.   For an analysis of the history of the collection see F. Buranelli,
La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi, Roma 1989, pp. 15-34 and F. Buranelli
(ed.), La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi I, La ceramica, Citta\ del
Vaticano 1997, pp. 7 ff.

5.   F. Buranelli, La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi, Roma 1989.

6.   L. Agostiniani, F. Buranelli, F. Gaultier et al., La raccolta
Giacinto Guglielmi 1, La ceramica, Roma 1997.

7.   F. Buranelli, La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi, Roma 1989, pp.
107-118.

8.   I just want to underscore, for example, the possibility of further
analysis for the context of axe no. 87, contained in the
pseudo-panathenaic amphora inv. no. MGE 29525 ( = L. Agostiniani, F.
Buranelli, F. Gaultier et al., La raccolta Giacinto Guglielmi 1, La
ceramica, Roma 1997, n. 30). Another interesting situation occurs with
helmet no. 136, probably buried with a crack caused by a sharp-edged
weapon.