Re: TeX-macro-global/--with-tex-input-dirs

David Kastrup <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.auc-tex
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:

> * David Kastrup (2005-01-15) writes:
>
>> Well, we can't really detect where to install preview.sty and friends
>> in that manner: that needs to get done at installation time.  So we
>> better not rip out everything until after the merge.
>>
>> What we will probably have to do at some point of time is the
>> following:
>>
>> 1) install preview.sty and stuff somewhere in the Emacs tree and and
>> then do either
>>
>> a) adjust TEXINPUTS appropriately
>>
>> b) do our own \RequirePackage command including the complete path.
>>
>> If we do b) that has the disadvantage that placing
>> \usepackage{preview} in the document will probably load a different
>> file.  If we do a) that has the disadvantage that compiling TeX
>> files might cause different results from inside of Emacs and
>> outside.
>
> I like the idea that one does not have to put a
> "\usepackage{preview}" into the document.

Bing, your wish has been granted.  This is now done via
preview-default-preamble.

> What would be needed in addition would be a way to specify the
> different options preview.sty provides.

Bing, your wish has been granted.  preview-default-option-list exists
now.

> What could make trouble is stuff like \PreviewMacro if the file is
> compiled outside of Emacs.

Bing, your wish has been granted.  Put stuff like that into
prauctex.def in the way the documentation recommends.

Looks like it is high time preview-latex get integrated into AUCTeX so
that people take a look at it some time or other...

But we'll still have to stuff preview.sty and its friends somewhere.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.