Re: Bug#290635: auctex: Should allow customizeation of LaTeX-item-beamer
"Dr. Thomas Baumann" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.auc-tex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:12:56 +0100 David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > T. Baumann <[email protected]> writes: > > > Frank Küster <frank <at> kuesterei.ch> writes: > > > >> a user of beamer.el in Debian has reported the following wishlist bug: > >> > >> Jorgen Schaefer <forcer <at> debian.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Package: auctex > >> > Version: 11.53-1 > >> > Severity: wishlist > >> > > >> > LaTeX-item-beamer should have an option that stops it from reading an > >> > overlay argument (or otherwise allow that (setq LaTeX-item-list ...) in the > >> > TeX-add-style-hook to be overridden). Not all people use overlays > >> > extensively, and for those who don't it's annoying to always say "no, > >> > really, I don't want overlays"... > >> > >> As far as I can see, TeX-arg-beamer-overlay-spec is still always and > >> unconditionally called in TeX-item-beamer. > >> > >> As usual, it seems to me that a customizable option along with a C-u > >> toggle would be the best solution. > > > > The following patch should add the C-u functionality. I'll get back with the > > customization this week after I checked other style files... > > I don't think this makes sense. Typing C-u before the command > certainly is more effort than just typing RET as an answer to the > prompt. > I see the point in a customization of the default behaviour for people not working with overlays at all. And, as Ralf said, in this case C-u can help adding an overlay spec ocasionally. This is implemented in the attached patch. > However, the context sensitivity could save typing indeed, at least by > offering a sensible default: if the previous item in the current > environment is without beamer tag, offer an empty string for > completion, if it is of the form <a-b>, offer <b+1-> as completion, if > it is of the form <a->, offer <a+1->. Something like that. Cool idea, but I think this will require more than the usual three lines of code... I'll put it on the ToDo-list and I'll appreciate hints and comments. Thomas > > -- > David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
beamer.patch
(application/octet-stream, 1.4 KB)
--- beamer.el 2005-01-13 06:58:31.000000000 +0100
+++ /home/tb/src/lisp/beamer.el 2005-01-18 10:38:11.366652776 +0100
@@ -18,12 +18,18 @@
;;; Code:
+(defvar LaTeX-beamer-section-labels-flag nil
+ "If non-nil section labels are added")
+
+(defcustom LaTeX-beamer-item-overlay-flag t
+ "If nil do not query for an overlay in itemize-like environments."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'LaTeX-macro)
+
(TeX-add-style-hook
"beamer"
(lambda ()
- (defvar beamer-use-section-labels-flag nil
- "Controls whether section labels are added")
- (unless beamer-use-section-labels-flag
+ (unless LaTeX-beamer-section-labels-flag
(make-local-variable 'LaTeX-section-hook)
(setq LaTeX-section-hook
'(LaTeX-section-heading
@@ -130,10 +136,16 @@
(insert TeX-grop TeX-grcl))))
(defun LaTeX-item-beamer ()
- "Insert a new item with an optional overlay argument."
+ "Insert a new item with an optional overlay argument.
+If the prefix argument is given the overlay specification is not asked for."
+ (if (listp current-prefix-arg)
+ (setq current-prefix-arg (car current-prefix-arg))
+ current-prefix-arg)
(TeX-insert-macro "item")
(delete-horizontal-space)
- (TeX-arg-beamer-overlay-spec 0)
+ (if (or (and current-prefix-arg (not LaTeX-beamer-item-overlay-flag))
+ (and (not current-prefix-arg) LaTeX-beamer-item-overlay-flag))
+ (TeX-arg-beamer-overlay-spec 0))
(insert " ")
(indent-according-to-mode))