Re: XEmacs segfault

David Kastrup <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.auc-tex
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:

> * David Kastrup (2005-02-01) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> When trying to prepare an example for the xemacs-beta list XEmacs just
>>> died.  I am currently on a dial-up connection and won't search for the
>>> reference to the respective message including a backtrace but you
>>> should be able to find it via Gmane.
>>>
>>> I suspect the segfault is a result of the presence of shy groups in
>>> `LaTeX-auto-class-regexp-list'.  At least it doesn't happen if I
>>> remove the entries containing shy groups from the variable.  We
>>> should definitely not ship 11.55 with these regexps enabled in
>>> XEmacs.
>>
>> !@##@$#!
>
> Yes, it's really getting funny.
>
>> What XEmacs version?
>
> 21.4.16.  There was some discussion on the XEmacs lists about problems
> with shy groups in connection with Gnus.  In this case the result was
> a hang of XEmacs.  As far as I know this started with 21.4.16.  They
> recently found a fix for that but I don't know if this will fix as
> well the segfault I am seeing here.
>
> It wouldn't be a big deal to disable the regexps in concern for XEmacs
> in general, but if we get some feedback from the XEmacs people we
> could probably disable them for affected releases only.

Maybe it is just a problem of initializing the data structures once.
Just do
(string-match "\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(\\(.\
               \\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)\\)" "x")
once, and everything will turn out fine.

Or something.  I hate life.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.