Re: [preview-latex-devel] CVS-1.227; aclocal.m4 and lib/Makefile deleted by make distclean

Ralf Angeli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.auc-tex,gmane.emacs.latex.preview.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[Moving this discussion over to preview-latex-devel and auc-tex
mailing lists as this now is more a development question concerning
both packages.]

* David Kastrup (2005-02-12) writes:

> Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2005-02-12) writes:
>>
>>> Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> ,----[ <URL:http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html> ]
[...]
>>>> That means deleting these files doesn't seem correct.
>>>
>>> It does not say so very explicitly.  distclean is, as it is worded
>>> intended to turn a fresh tarball into a fresh tarball.  So it would
>>> appear appropriate if it did not touch CVS-only files.  However, I
>>> think that it would be ok if it deleted backup files in general that
>>> strictly speaking would come about from editing sources, not
>>> compiling.
>>
>> I don't consider this a good idea.  For example with AUCTeX I often do
>> a `make distclean' when aclocal.m4 or configure.in was changed.  I
>> wouldn't wanna let this delete my backup files.  Besides, it would
>> violate the guideline cited above as the files are not generated by
>> configuring or building.
>>
>> Out of curiosity I looked at the Makefiles of autoconf and Emacs.  The
>> former does nothing about them and the latter has an extra target
>> `extraclean' for that purpose.
>
> Ok, do what you consider correct.  I actually almost never make clean,
> anyhow...

Attached is a proposal for AUCTeX's Makefile.in.  Maybe something like
this would be feasible for preview-latex as well.  I still have to
figure out what to do with files like INSTALL, TODO etc. but the
scheme should be visible already.

-- 
Ralf
(unnamed) (text/x-patch, 1.6 KB)
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/auctex/auctex/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -r1.79 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in	10 Feb 2005 23:51:16 -0000	1.79
+++ Makefile.in	12 Feb 2005 19:53:10 -0000
@@ -44,11 +44,7 @@
 	texmathp.el multi-prompt.el tex-mik.el font-latex.el tex-font.el \
 	context.el context-en.el context-nl.el tex-fold.el \
 	toolbar-x.el tex-bar.el
-AUCELC = tex.elc tex-buf.elc latex.elc tex-info.elc \
-	texmathp.elc multi-prompt.elc tex-mik.elc font-latex.elc tex-font.elc \
-	context.elc context-en.elc context-nl.elc tex-fold.elc \
-	toolbar-x.elc tex-bar.elc
-# Why not $(AUCSRC:.el=.elc) ?
+AUCELC = $(AUCSRC:.el=.elc)
 
 STYLESRC = style/prosper.el \
 	   style/slides.el    style/foils.el     style/amstex.el \
@@ -86,6 +82,10 @@
 	configure install-sh $(MKINSTALLDIRS) Makefile.in \
 	tex-site.el.in lpath.el $(CONTRIB) $(CONTRIB_MULE)
 
+CLEANFILES = $(AUCSRC:.el=.elc) $(STYLESRC:.el=.elc)
+
+DISTCLEANFILES = Makefile tex-site.el config.*
+
 NOSEARCH = style/.nosearch
 
 all:	lisp
@@ -172,11 +172,18 @@
 	$(ELCC) -f batch-byte-compile $<
 
 clean:
-	rm -rf *~ \#*\# *.elc style/*.elc
+	rm -f $(CLEANFILES)
 	(cd doc; $(MAKE) clean)
 
-distclean: clean
-	rm -rf Makefile tex-site.el config.* autom4te.cache
+distclean:
+	rm -f $(CLEANFILES) $(DISTCLEANFILES)
+	(cd doc; $(MAKE) distclean)
+
+maintainer-clean: distclean
+	rm -rf autom4te.cache
+
+extraclean: maintainer-clean
+	rm -f *~ \#*\#
 
 tar-ball-clean:
 	@if [ "X$(TAG)" = "X" ]; then echo "*** No tag ***"; exit 1; fi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.