Re: AUCTeX configuration, hardwiring etc...

David Kastrup wrote:
> But the option name is just a detail, and if it should prove
> necessary, we can still change it easily enough in later versions.
> Still, my vote is on --with-package-lispdir with a slight margin over
> --with-auctex-lispdir.  

Mine too.

> > (I do not think there is much need to install into
> > "$lispdir/no" 8^))
> 
> Tell that to Norway, the country of trolls...

They'll have to file a bug report at autoconf themselves.
;-)

/JÅ


-- 
Cats humour us because they know that their ancestors ate ours