Re: preview-latex icon proposal
David Kastrup <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.auc-tex,gmane.emacs.latex.preview.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes: > * Jan-Ake Larsson (2005-02-17) writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote: >>> a) the "man in the middle" looks better in your proposal, no question >>> about it. >>> b) the black border around the sign is a mistake: at this size, it has >>> either be so thin that we get heavy digitilization artifacts, in >>> particular with rounded curves, or so thick that it dominates the >>> color which should be red. >>> c) SVG or not: I am afraid that one would still need to edit out >>> digitization artifacts by hand (aka hinting). >> >> Agreed. Unfortunately, I have to say, I like the triangular signs >> better. And if it is only the question of hand-editing four images,... > > Well, it would not be a problem to export the manikin in various > sizes and insert it into the triangles of the current icons. But > those triangles suffered from scaling as well. For example the 12px > and 20px triangles have a somewhat bumpy top. "suffered from scaling" is the understatement of the year. I think that I actually tried avoiding scaling artifacts at some sizes by doing a copy&paste&trim job, but that was not necessarily a win, resulting in uneven features. Ok, can you try working with the following triangles? I've taken quite a bit of pain getting them right as well as I could manage. If you fill in your little man, and don't do any dithering or other nonsense when saving, we should get closer to "good". -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
dang12.xpm
(image/x-xpixmap, 319 B) - not displayed
dang14.xpm
(image/x-xpixmap, 379 B) - not displayed
dang16.xpm
(image/x-xpixmap, 447 B) - not displayed
dang20.xpm
(image/x-xpixmap, 607 B) - not displayed
dang24.xpm
(image/x-xpixmap, 784 B) - not displayed