Re: preview-latex icon proposal

David Kastrup <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.auc-tex,gmane.emacs.latex.preview.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:

> * Jan-Ake Larsson (2005-02-17) writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> a) the "man in the middle" looks better in your proposal, no question
>>> about it.
>>> b) the black border around the sign is a mistake: at this size, it has
>>> either be so thin that we get heavy digitilization artifacts, in
>>> particular with rounded curves, or so thick that it dominates the
>>> color which should be red.
>>> c) SVG or not: I am afraid that one would still need to edit out
>>> digitization artifacts by hand (aka hinting).
>>
>> Agreed. Unfortunately, I have to say, I like the triangular signs
>> better. And if it is only the question of hand-editing four images,...
>
> Well, it would not be a problem to export the manikin in various
> sizes and insert it into the triangles of the current icons.  But
> those triangles suffered from scaling as well.  For example the 12px
> and 20px triangles have a somewhat bumpy top.

"suffered from scaling" is the understatement of the year.  I think
that I actually tried avoiding scaling artifacts at some sizes by
doing a copy&paste&trim job, but that was not necessarily a win,
resulting in uneven features.

Ok, can you try working with the following triangles?  I've taken
quite a bit of pain getting them right as well as I could manage.  If
you fill in your little man, and don't do any dithering or other
nonsense when saving, we should get closer to "good".



-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
dang12.xpm (image/x-xpixmap, 319 B) - not displayed
dang14.xpm (image/x-xpixmap, 379 B) - not displayed
dang16.xpm (image/x-xpixmap, 447 B) - not displayed
dang20.xpm (image/x-xpixmap, 607 B) - not displayed
dang24.xpm (image/x-xpixmap, 784 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.