Re: Issues with japanese support

* Masayuki Ataka (2005-02-18) writes:

>> It would be good to use something like the value of
>> `word-across-newline' in the regular expression,
>> i.e. "\\(\\cj\\|\\cc\\|\\ct\\)\n\\(\\cj\\|\\cc\\|\\ct\\)".  If the
>> variable `word-across-newline' should be used, one somehow will have
>> to silence the byte compiler.
>
> To define `LaTeX-nospace-between-char-regexp' looks good to me.
>
> (defcustom LaTeX-nospace-between-char-regexp
>   (when (featurep 'mule)
>     (if (boundp 'word-across-newline)
> 	word-across-newline
>       "\\c|"))

Hm, it is a bit dangerous to have a value of nil here because the code
in `LaTeX-fill-delete-newlines' could then match only "\n".  Of course
this is very unlikely to happen because there is a test for mule as
well.  But if we suppose that somebody removes that test without
looking at `LaTeX-nospace-between-char-regexp' this could lead to
problems.

How about the following?

(if (featurep 'xemacs)
    (if (boundp 'word-across-newline)
	word-across-newline
      "\\cj\\|\\cc\\|\\ct")
  "\\c|")

>   "Regular expression of such characters which can be a word across newline."

This does not refer to the variables's name.  Maybe the following is a
bit clearer:

  "Regexp matching a character where no interword space is necessary.
Words formed by such characters can be broken across newlines."

>   :group 'LaTeX
>   :type 'regexp)
>
> # Where to put it?
> # After `;;; Filling' ?

Yes.

-- 
Ralf