Re: CJK in (auctex)I18n

From: Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CJK in (auctex)I18n
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:06:14 +0100 (CET)

> > > > Basically, I guess the manual entry should be revised.
> > >
> > > Yes.  Emacs > 21.3 works just fine for CJK languages.
> >
> > You mean Emacs < 22.1 does not support UNICODE CJK chars?  If
> > so, I agree with you.  UNICODE support of Emacs < 22.1 is
> > limited.  Maybe we should put some words for unicode.
> 
> Regarding my cjk-enc.el mode I need the many different mule encodings
> instead of Unicode.
> 
I didn't catch your aim of `JUST' in:
  Emacs > 21.3 works just fine for CJK languages.
# I'm poor at English.

You wanted to say that `(Emacs > 21.3) is needed for CJK languages'?
Or you wanted to just say that `Emacs 21.3 works fine for CJK languages'?

I think (Emacs > 20) works fine for CJK languages 
if UNICODE with CJK are not required.


> > [...] J@TeX{} for Japanese; H@LaTeX{} and k@TeX{} for Korean; and
> > @acronym{CJK}-@LaTeX{} package for @acronym{CJK}.
> 
> I would rather say `and CJK-LaTeX for supporting multiple CJK scripts
> within a single document'.

Good.
I changed `CJK-LaTeX' to `CKJ-LaTeX package', because
jTeX, pTeX, kTeX, etc... are not package, but systems.

thanks,
---
email: [email protected]
Name:: Masayuki Ataka // (Japan)