Re: Two more website styles

Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:16:58 +0100
Newsgroups	gmane.emacs.auc-tex
Organization	nil
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
* Masayuki Ataka (2005-03-23) writes:

> From: Ralf Angeli <[email protected]>
> Subject: Two more website styles
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:54:40 +0100
>
> Three comments,
>
> (1) Doctype is wrong.
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
>
> Maybe this is typo of `XHTML 1.0'.

Oh, thanks for pointing this out.  I wonder where I had this from and
why I got it wrong.  Because I remember that I was very careful about
that back when I introduced the page based on XHTML 1.1.  And
interestingly validator.w3.org said it was a valid XHTML 1.1 page.
Now I found a bug report
(<URL:http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/long_list.cgi?buglist=980>)
against the validator concerning this problem and the development
version of the validator mentioned in this bug report indeed told me
that this is not valid XHTML 1.1.

So I looked into <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/conformance.html>,
adapted the page accordingly (only multipage-3) and it should be fixed
now.

> (2) I don't like that the text width is fixed.

It has the advantage that lines don't become too long and therefore
hard to read on larger displays.  This is something I really hate in
pages not limiting the line length.  I think with the em-based
approach used in multipage-3 is the best solution here.

> (3) I like 3 of them when I see it with emacs-w3m ;)

Does it look okay in w3m?  I don't have it here.  And actually I
haven't checked the page in lynx yet.

-- 
Ralf