Re: Questions on completion
"Roland Winkler" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bbdb.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon Oct 30 2017 Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: > I keep records with full names (titles, middle names, etc.) > in multiple scripts (Latin and Greek), but in emails I > prefer to use abbreviated Latinised names, as they both are > more universal and look better in my MUA. I found the > mail-name xfield to be a convenient place to store these. Thank you, I see your point. (I might do a similar thing in your situation.) > and advise bbdb-complete-mail to first pass the candidates it > offers through bbdb-mua-summary-unify. How does this go? Is there a hook I overlooked? (bbdb-complete-mail is not the most userfriendly piece of code if you want to achieve something that is not yet implemented as an option.) > The only missing aspect of this approach is offering Latinised > mail-names as completion candidates. This can be implemented: mail-name becomes another element of bbdb-completion-list. Then these mail names must be hashed in bbdb-hashtable so that they become available for completion. (Please give me some time.) > AFAICT, Emacs now provides two standard, high-level and > configurable interfaces to arbitrary completion: in-buffer > completion via completion-at-point/completion-in-region and > minibuffer completion via completing-read. > > At first glance, bbdb-complete-mail seems to emulate some of > the work completion-at-point/completion-in-region > could/should be doing, e.g. managing the *Completions* > buffer. Though I am not particularly familiar with the > code, I have a feeling that bbdb-complete-mail could be > simplified if it were refactored to use one of these > built-in functions instead. The general problem I see is that bbdb-complete-mail (and likewise bbdb-completing-read-mails) is not performing ordinary completion. In that sense, you could call these function names misnomers. You can type "Joh" to get John Smith's email address in BBDB "[email protected]". So what you type and what you get in the end can be very different stories. Also, bbdb-complete-mail provides "cycling": if you already have "[email protected]" and you run bbdb-cmplete-mail again (because John Smith has multiple email addresses in his BBDB record), you may get "[email protected]". I am not aware of other emacs functions providing such behavior, nor am I aware of other scenarios where such a behavior would be useful, nor do I know how such behavior could be combined with other completion frontends. (I do not know anything about the frontends you mentioned.) Roland