Re: UTR#9 - Unicode BiDi (was Re: OpenOffice BiDi kudos)
"Eli Zaretskii" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bidi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:15:13 -0400 > From: Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> > > Is it true that your implementation of Unicode Bidi algorithm > does not follow the UTR#9, with respect to handligh dash? Just > wanted to make sure this is not true, otherwise, please consider > following the standard. Handa-san is currently trying to plug the sequential implementation of UAX#9 that I wrote into the Emacs display code. The code I wrote renders "H-5" as "-5H", as per UAX#9. One needs to type "H-{RLM}5" to get the "H-5" result that most Hebrew users want. I guess we will need to get used to type RLM and LRM in similar situations, since we must be UAX#9 compliant, and since UAX#9 results in such madness in quite a few cases like this, sigh.