Re: UTR#9 - Unicode BiDi (was Re: OpenOffice BiDi kudos)
Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bidi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> writes: > > Is it true that your implementation of Unicode Bidi algorithm > > does not follow the UTR#9, with respect to handligh dash? Just > > wanted to make sure this is not true, otherwise, please consider > > following the standard. > > First of all, my implementation (the function > bidi-reorder-simple) is far from UTF#9. I don't know how > UTR#9 treats handligh dash. By that function, "H-5" is > rendered as "5H-" in RtoL context. Emacs-bidi also contains > Ehud's algorithm. With it, "H-5" is rendered as "5-H". So, should it really get inot Emacs' main track? > --- > Ken'ichi HANDA > [email protected] behdad,