Re: Is emacs-bidi merged int o unicode-2 ?
Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bidi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: "Yotam Medini" <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:36:02 +0200 > > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:32:01 +0200 > > > > ... > > > > The branch name is emacs-bidi. The instructions to use the Emacs CVS > > can be found here: > > > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=emacs > > Looks like this branch is inactive for about two years. > Isn't it merged into the 'unicode-2' branch ? No, it isn't, for the obvious reason that the emacs-bidi branch is extremely unstable, so it would screw up the unicode-2 branch which is used by several people who actively work on the Unicode version of Emacs. Unfortunately, there's no similar enthusiasm for making the emacs-bidi branch stable; if this goes on, we will never have a bidi-enabled Emacs.