bug#77928: Regression in Emacs pretest 31.0.90
Roshan Shariff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG8iPGyAS8jrPTA_xuTq9p7hLf3juNaqZerARO36D20+1Vm-zw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 at 06:48, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > And I really don't see any reasons to keep this argument, where it is > clear we disagree about fundamental issues, and no one else feels it's > important enough to chime in. I understand, but can I at least push for reverting this patch? * It is trying to accommodate a new way of using :custom-face which has never been possible in any version of use-package included in Emacs. * In the process, it breaks a way of using it which has worked perfectly well in the past. * It makes it impossible for any simple workaround to support the existing use case, while trying to support a new use-case that can be accommodated without the patch with a simple work-around. If we can't agree on how things should work, why not just go with not creating a regression? I don't think the behaviour this patch introduces is obviously "more correct" so doesn't it make sense to stick with the status quo? I would be happy to create a documentation patch explaining how to accomplish what the patch author wants, but without breaking things for existing users as this patch does.