bug#81550: 30.2; add project-specific hooks to unload-feature-special-hooks
Lin Jian via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Aug 2026 21:30:37 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >> From: Lin Jian <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:10:40 +0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:28:33 +0800 >> >> From: Lin Jian via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, >> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> When supporting `unload-feature' for my project backend, I have to write >> >> a FEATURE-unload-function to clean `project-find-functions' and >> >> `project-list-exclude'. >> >> >> >> That FEATURE-unload-function can be omitted if `project-find-functions' >> >> and `project-list-exclude' are added to `unload-feature-special-hooks'. >> >> I suggest adding them. >> > >> > Does it really happen frequently that unloading a feature affects >> > which files project.el will consider, or is that a rare corner case? >> >> If by "a feature" you mean a random feature, then probably that random >> feature does not need to clean project-specific hooks. >> >> However, note that I do not mean a random feature. I mean specific >> features: project backends. See C-h P project RET for definition of >> project backend. These specific features always have to clean >> project-specific hooks if they decide to support `unload-feature'. > > But unload-feature-special-hooks is a general hook, not limited to > project backends, is it? Or what am I missing? To be clear, I am not arguing anything. I just try to clarify things, in case needed. If, in your first reply, you said something like: > Project backends are rare features so we should not add > project-specific hooks to `unload-feature-special-hooks'. Then I would find it clear and I would see no need to clarify it.