bug#81512: [PATCH] Add command `outline-occur'

martin rudalics via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 > I have some questions or remarks about the new variable
 > `display-buffer-default-alist' you have added, about its semantics and
 > documentation.  I have not been following this thread, I apologize if I
 > miss something important.
 >
 > First, the name: this variable seems to be intended to override some
 > (default) behavior; it's binding has one of the highest priorities.
 > This means that it's on the other end than variables that are typically
 > named "-default", which are considered with lowest priority.  Unless I'm
 > missing something, the name is confusing and not consistent with our
 > typical nomenclature.

Agreed.  But we already have 'display-buffer-base-action' which probably
should have been called 'display-buffer-default-action' and the first
occurrence of "alist" is in 'display-buffer-alist' so it's reasonable to
have 'display-buffer-default-alist' right beneath that.  Anyway, feel
free to suggest a better term.  We'll be all ears I suppose.

 > Second: the added documentation says that this is a variable "which Lisp
 > programs may let-bind to specify conditional actions for nested
 > `display-buffer' calls."  I don't understand the connection to nested
 > calls here.  When at all is `display-buffer' been called recursively?
 > And in such a case, which variable is then crucial for which call of
 > `display-buffer'?  Is the outer or inner call ignoring one the variables?

A let-binding of `display-buffer-default-alist' is supposed to override
the ACTION argument of a 'display-buffer' call nested within that
binding.  For nested let-bindings of 'display-buffer-default-alist' the
usual rules for let-bindings apply.  If something is not clear about
this, we'll have to fix it.

 > Finally, it is not so nice to see how many variables we now have to
 > control or override the behavior of `display-buffer'.  I wonder whether
 > the design we have is really a good one, or if we have redundant
 > variables now.

Maybe.  Unfortunately, we also have to carry around obsolete variables from
bygone versions.

martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.