bug#81462: [PATCH] Skip non-key events in `where-is-internal' with FIRSTONLY

Aaron Zeng via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.bugs
Message-ID <CAB7SQMHyj4APaQYzqqTH55sDPwy3sV2HsfqZm7Fycs3Bc0YvEA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 4:57 AM Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ping!  How can we make some further progress with this issue?
>
> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 23:07:25 -0400
> > From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > I'd argue they *can* be invoked by users, by causing the
> > corresponding event.  I think it's not that different from the "events"
> > used for menu entries.  Or the pseudo-events used for clicks on GUI
> > elements like `mode-line`, `left-fringe`, ...
> >
> > I think it's better to "demote" them (i.e. list them further down the
> > list) rather than completely skip them.
> >

Returning to my original motivation for wanting to tweak the output of
where-is-internal in the first place, I'd like to mention that another
cause of suboptimal substitute-command-keys for my users is that many
of them are Spacemacs users, and that distribution happens to use the
bind-map package to set up some "leader key" style key bindings (and
also enables evil-mode).

In particular, there's a very large and nested keymap which is bound
globally under SPC in emulation-mode-map-alists.  I think for
implementation reasons this needs to be a pretty high priority
keymap---it needs to come before even evil-mode's
emulation-mode-map-alists entries.

However, the bindings available under this global SPC leader key are
all pretty long, and when a shorter key binding for the same command
is available in, e.g., the major mode map, I would prefer to show the
latter in substitute-command-keys output.

So, if there was a way to control the priority order of keymaps for
substitute-command-keys/where-is-internal's output (while still
respecting the shadowing caused by the *actual* priority order), that
would make this easier.  In my use case, it seems more natural to
determine the priority by demoting entire keymaps/entries in the
current-active-maps list rather than specific input events.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.